Pine Labs Q3 Results: Co swings to black with cons PAT of Rs 42 crore versus YoY loss; revenue rises 24%

Pine Labs Q3 Results: Co swings to black with cons PAT of Rs 42 crore versus YoY loss; revenue rises 24%


Payment solutions company Pine Labs posted a consolidated net profit of Rs 42 crore in the December-ended quarter versus a loss of Rs 57 crore in the year-ago period. The revenue from operations stood at Rs 744 crore in Q3FY26, rising 24% over Rs 602 crore in the corresponding quarter of the last financial year.

This was Pine Lab’s second earnings since its listing in November.

The company’s profits jumped 600% on a sequential basis compared to Rs 6 crore in Q2FY26, while the revenue saw a 15% uptick QoQ from Rs 650 crore in the July-September quarter.

The company’s adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA) was reported at Rs 171 crore, up 59% YoY, while EBITDA margin saw a 23% growth.

The contribution margin was up 19% YoY in the quarter under review to Rs 551 crore.


Platform GTV (Gross Transaction Value) grew 29% YoY to Rs 4.5 lakh crore with the highest ever quarterly volumes for both Digital Infrastructure and Transaction Platform and Issuing & Acquiring Platform.

The number of transactions grew 23% YoY to 192.6 crore.
“We recognise revenue on a netbasis, reflecting amounts retained after payment processing fees and pass-through charges payable to banks and
network partners. Certain peers in the payments industry continue to present revenues on a gross basis,” the company filing said.

Cash flow

Pine Labs’ Q3FY26 operating cash flow stood at negative Rs 124 crore (excluding early settlement) and negative Rs 152 crore, including early settlement.

Also read: Maruti Suzuki Q3 Results: Standalone PAT rises 4% YoY to Rs 3,794 crore; revenue jumps 29%

“The quarterly movement in working capital is driven by festive demand/higher transaction volumes in Q3, which is expected to normalise in the coming quarter,” the exchange filing said.

(Disclaimer: The recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times.)



Source link

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *